ESG News: fines, funding, and frameworks

An open laptop with a close up of the keyboard and the screen int he backgrounds. Growing out of the keyboard is a small stem with 4 green leaves indicating climate -technology companies
For financial professionals only

This week in ESG

A lukewarm outcome from the biodiversity conference, EU emissions cuts, and an investment company fined over misleading ESG claims.

Key highlights

🌍 COP 16 Biodiversity Summit mixed results – a plan to raise money from companies profiting from nature, like pharmaceuticals creating new drugs from plants, was agreed. But little progress was made towards implementing the biodiversity framework set-up in 2022. Only a fraction of the required funding to support nature was offered up by developed countries themselves. A massive shortfall remains. 

📄Biodiversity risk reporting – over 500 companies worldwide have now committed to report on biodiversity risk. They'll produce Taskforce on Nature Related Financial Disclosures (TNFDs) as part of their 2024/25 corporate reporting. 

✅ EU cuts emissions by over 8% – new reporting from the European Commission shows the bloc cut its greenhouse gas emissions by over 8% in 2023, once of its largest annual declines in decades.

❌ WisdomTree fined for misleading ESG claims –fund manager fined $4m by the US Securities and Exchange commission (SEC). They had invested in coal mining, natural gas extraction and tobacco, despite claiming these were excluded from certain ESG products.

Chart spotlight - climate tech funding

Chart showing different types of climate-technology companies and their funding from Q1 2022 to Q3 2024 steadily declining

Source:  BloombergNEF Note: Data excludes undisclosed values and deals under $1m

The chart above shows the funding provided to 'climate tech' start-ups each quarter since Q1 2022, split by sector.

Why this matters? 

The generation of new and innovative climate solutions are key to reaching the world's emissions goals - so it's discouraging to see a continued drop in finance being provided to early-stage companies in this area. Bloomberg analysis puts this drop partially down to greater competition for funding versus AI related projects and companies. Here the clearer commercialisation benefits of AI often win compared with less understood and potentially riskier climate technologies, like green hydrogen or nuclear fission.

Climate tech is also struggling to attract funding for its later (and more expensive) stages of development, including the building of physical infrastructure. New technology often initially requires public policy support to be successful, an area that is becoming increasingly harder to rely on as climate issues become more politicised. 

This article is for financial professionals only. Any information contained within is of a general nature and should not be construed as a form of personal recommendation or financial advice. Nor is the information to be considered an offer or solicitation to deal in any financial instrument or to engage in any investment service or activity. Parmenion accepts no duty of care or liability for loss arising from any person acting, or refraining from acting, as a result of any information contained within this article. All investment carries risk. The value of investments, and the income from them, can go down as well as up and investors may get back less than they put in. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.